Sunday, October 09, 2005

was the oklahoma suicide a terrorist attack?

http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/008444.php

help me collect info. If this guy was a muslim and tried to get in to the game, he was a suicide bomber.

21 comments:

Nikki said...

Mike, here's the link I was telling you about. There are severla stories about it at this page:

http://mypetjawa.mu.nu/

Right here (not sure if a link is one of the accepted HTML tags or not, so doing it both ways.

Caficho said...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2005_University_of_Oklahoma_bombing

Judas Juice said...

David Hoffman, The Oklahoma City Bombing and the Politics of Terror, 1998, Feral House Pr. — Exposé of the Oklahoma City bombing.

http://www.constitution.org/ocbpt/ocbpt.htm

no way José said...

>was the oklahoma suicide a terrorist attack?

It wasn't.

BIGDOG said...

Ok so lets discuss your premise

"> was the oklahoma suicide a terrorist attack?

> It wasn't."

What in your mind dictates a terrorist attack?

Do others have to die around them for it to be so?

Could it have been far worse and what was his intent?

What information lead to your decision?...please share..:)

no way José said...

>What information lead to your decision?...please share..:)

Common sense.

BIGDOG said...

Funny how you avoid the real issue. Common sense as you put it dont cut it with me dood. I want information and you to answer the questions you avoided. Wich BTW requires more than common sense.

Please answer my other questions first.

no way José said...

If all your effort is put towards looking for conspiracies, that's all you will ever find. You'll never find the "truth", and I assume that is your ultimate goal, if you disregard reality and substitute it with complex fantasies based on wild speculation constructed from questionable source material.

Maybe my level of intellectualism just isn't to up to par, like dropping f-bombs on the air, Mr. Dog, so I'm sorry I couldn't accommodate answering your questions about non issues.

Dood.

BIGDOG said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
BIGDOG said...

Once again avoiding the issues or the questions i asked of you.

As far as F-bombs. Still doesnt excuse you ignoring my questions.

The non issues as you put was forementioned by you sir... so i questioned your premise. Now defend your premise or SHUT THE FUCK UP...pretty damn simple.

I'll repeat for your issues of ignorance.

What in your mind dictates a terrorist attack?

Do others have to die around them for it to be so?

Could it have been far worse and what was his intent?

no way José said...

I'm not sure if you have some sort of personality defect, but whatever the case may be, I hope you seek some sort of help. Your constant raving lunacy can't be healthy.

By the way, your questions are hypothetical in nature and have nothing to do with the facts. You are asking for my opinion on what I think about something that is totally subjective and will be different for everyone.

I don't get why you want to make a mountain out of a mole hill.

BIGDOG said...

no way jose' said:

"By the way, your questions are hypothetical in nature and have nothing to do with the facts."

I asked about your premise and questioned it. It was your oppinion. So you are saying your premise is hypothetical. Well tx for atleast telling me you are full of shit...lol

no way José said...

I get the feeling that you always have to have to last word.

I'm just looking forward to see if you're a man of your word when you promised to Michael T., "I'm not going to call your fucking show..."

BIGDOG said...

You are not man enough to even answer i few questions. So why should i be worried about your oppinion of me....concerning me calling the show.

You know its real easy. Put up or shut up. As far as the last word? WTF does that have to do with you not answering 3 questions. I figured a simpleton like you could atleast muster enough bile to answer 3 questions.

What exactly are you afraid of jose? me getting the last word? HAHAHAHAHAHA!!! truely pathetic.

I'll repeat for your issues of ignorance.

What in your mind dictates a terrorist attack?

Do others have to die around them for it to be so?

Could it have been far worse and what was his intent?

no way José said...

Neither of those three questions have anything to do with what actually happened.

Good luck with your book, though.

BIGDOG said...

HAHAHA!!

You brought it up. I questioned you on it. The point of open discussion is answering questions from another. Sorry guess you dont like someone questioning you. Oh and you cant interupt me like some like to do. The questions i asked pertain to what happened and your premise of the same. So again put up or shut up.

I'll repeat for your issues of ignorance.

What in your mind dictates a terrorist attack?

Do others have to die around them for it to be so?

Could it have been far worse and what was his intent?

no way José said...

I don't dislike people questioning me and I don't mind answering questions that I feel are pertinent to the topic. You seem to think your questions are more important than anything else, or else you might not have repeated them so many times.

As for my "issues of ignorance," it sounds to me like you're trying to rile me up on an issue that isn't of any major consequence.

BIGDOG said...

Bullshit you brought it up, i questioned your premise. Since you havent enough ballocks to back up your premise.

However im done with your lil game of dodge ball. I just know how much of an intellectual pussy you realy are. That satisfies me plenty. Oh BTW i didnt catch your on air name. I mean are you a pussy when it comes to being on air and on blog. Not knowing who you are persay, bolsters my suspicion how much a coward you are.

You made this too easy. Please try again soon...lol

no way José said...

For you this a victory over me and your gaining satisfaction from that? That is really sad.

You really are an egomaniac.

BIGDOG said...

The satisfaction gained is knowing you wont defend your bullshit rhetoric.

Thats not my ego speaking its your unwillingness to respond when challenged to defend your premise.

Has nothing to do with me. Its all on you.I dont have a problem telling you so.

I am confident in my politics. You on the other hand. Proofs in the pudding...good day sir...lol

no way José said...

Whatever Chris.