Wednesday, March 29, 2006

Watchdog contends budget bill broke law

The issue is bizarre, with even constitutional scholars saying they could not think of any precedent for the journey the budget bill took to becoming a law. Opponents point to elementary school civics lessons to make their case, while Republicans are evoking an obscure Supreme Court ruling from the 1890s to suggest a bill does not have to pass both chambers of Congress to become law.
Posted by at

20 comments:

Anonymous said...

Oh, screw it. Both parties of our enemies. I don't believe any of those bastards.

Who cares about the budget? We are being invaded by Mexico. The "party of national security" with no doors even on the hinges. I no longer have a political party. If we get one more conservative judge, I'm voting democrat or liberaltarian. Republicans are the libs, now. The libs are just socialists now.

We are being destroyed by libism. Look at KCMO. No education damns the children forever. But, we've got to make sure our museums are state of the art...like our government buildings, and our bullshit big government plans like STADIUMS!!! We need more money for roads in missouri. They get more money. We need MORE money for roads. The cops don't arrest the bad guys. KKFI gets fucking federal money. Burn in hell to all of those that beleive in stealing more than 10% of one's income for taxation...federal, state, and local combined. 10% permanent ceiling. And you diry libs take 40% and demand more.

Miguel en Cuidad de Kansas

Wednesday, March 29, 2006 at 11:10:00 PM CST
Anonymous said...

Let's see here. Lib havens...economic plight. Conservative havens...work for all...and more.

If MTJ actually believes in libism, why does he live in Johnson County? Probably because he loves his wife and sons. When it comes down to brass tacks, we see where THE respectable lib lives.

Saturday, April 1, 2006 at 6:54:00 PM CST
Anonymous said...

Invaded by mexico?

Is that how the native americans described it when they were handing food to the pilgrims?

I mean Mexicans dont come here because they want to take over our country, they come here because they can get food, and have a decent life.

When whites came here, their cause wasn't quite so innocent.

Dont throw stones from the door of a glass house.

Yeah this is some crazy stuff the neocons are trying to pull. It doesnt surprise me one bit though...they are always trying to find a loophole in laws and government to justify their agenda.

As far as Mike's argument about "Dirty Libs" most of the Libs I know think the stadium tax is just wrong, in fact the only people I know who support it are conservatives who believe it as an economic investment into our city. (except a few people hyped up on the Chiefs crack)

-Mild

Saturday, April 1, 2006 at 8:30:00 PM CST
Anonymous said...

Comparing the mexican invasion to the "white invasion" is classic libism, Mild. I love the view of the so-called "native american." They were all just upright, moral people. Then came oppressive whitey. That is just classic lib ignorance as well as classic white male lib self-hate.

So, Mild is for open borders like Marx. There is no need to challenge such a point. The only good communist, Mild, is a dead communist. Deport all illegals now!

If any person is for the stadium taxes, they are, by definition, not a conservative. I don't know who you are talking to, Mild, but no conservative would support such an obvious fraud on the people of Kansas City. Remember, if there were kick backs for politicians for educating our youth, then the KCMO school district would have its accreditation. But, as any thinker knows, big construction funded by big government is profitable for all the local elites, if you will.

Vote no on questions 1 and 2. Vote for NO REPUBLICANS in the mid-term elections. Maybe if the fake conservatives are voted out of power in 2006, they will come out with a strong deportation message in 2008.

Mike without a political party

Sunday, April 2, 2006 at 4:51:00 PM CDT
Anonymous said...

The prefix "neo" can denote that many of the movement's founders, originally liberals, Democrats or from socialist backgrounds, were new to conservatism, but can also refer to the comparatively recent emergence of this "new wave" of conservative thought, which coalesced in the early 1970s from a variety of intellectual roots in the decades following World War II. It also serves to distinguish the ideology from the viewpoints of "old" or traditional American conservatism.

'Christians are being played for the biggest suckers on the planet'



Historically, neoconservatives supported a militant anticommunism, tolerated more social welfare spending than was sometimes acceptable to libertarians and mainstream conservatives, supported civil equality for blacks and other minorities, and sympathized with a non-traditional foreign policy agenda that was less deferential to traditional conceptions of diplomacy and international law and less inclined to compromise principles even if that meant unilateral action. Indeed, domestic policy does not define neoconservatism — it is a movement founded on, and perpetuated by an aggressive approach to foreign policy, free trade, opposition to communism during the Cold War, support for Israel and Taiwan and opposition to Middle Eastern and other states that are perceived to support terrorism.

"New" conservatives initially approached this view from the political left, especially in reponse to key developments in modern American history.

The forerunners of neoconservativism were generally liberals or socialists who strongly supported the Second World War, and who were influenced by the Depression-era ideas of former New Dealers, trade unionists, and Trotskyists, particularly those who followed the political ideas of Max Shachtman. A number of future neoconservatives such as Jeane Kirkpatrick and Ken Adelman were Shachtmanites in their youth, while others were later involved with Social Democrats USA. Most neoconservatives, however, including those who have been close to SDUSA, will strenuously deny, even contrary to evidence, that they were ever Shachtmanites.

Opposition to Détente with the Soviet Union and the views of the anti-Soviet and anti-capitalist New Left, which emerged in response to the Soviet Union's break with Stalinism in the 1950s, would cause the Neoconservatives to split with the "liberal consensus" of the early postwar years. The original "neoconservative" theorists, such as Irving Kristol and Norman Podhoretz, were often associated with the magazine Commentary, and their intellectual evolution is quite evident in that magazine over the course of these years. Throughout the 1950s and early 1960s the early neoconservatives were anti-Communist socialists strongly supportive of the American Civil Rights Movement, integration, and Martin Luther King.


'conservatives in this country and Britian have also been played for suckers'

Neoconservatism, Judaism, and "Dual Loyalty"
Some opponents of neoconservatives have sought to emphasize their interest in Israel and the relatively large proportion of Jewish neoconservatives, and have raised the question of "dual loyalty". A number of critics, such as Pat Buchanan, have accused them of putting Israeli interests above those of America. In turn these critics have been labeled as anti-Semites by many neoconservatives (which in turn has led to accusations of professional smearing, and then paranoia, and so on).


Jews control this country and most of Europe. The evidence is overwhelming.


left-wing magazine AdBusters published a list of the "50 most influential neocons in the United States", noting that half of these were Jewish



http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neocons#Pejorative_use



Russ

Monday, April 3, 2006 at 10:42:00 AM CDT
Anonymous said...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_End_of_History_and_the_Last_Man

"What we may be witnessing is not just the end of the Cold War, or the passing of a particular period of post-war history, but the end of history as such: that is, the end point of mankind's ideological evolution and the universalization of Western liberal democracy as the final form of human government." (quoted from "The End of History?", 1989)


Russ

Monday, April 3, 2006 at 11:12:00 AM CDT
Anonymous said...

The Last Man (German: der letzte Mensch) was a term used by the philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche to describe the antithesis of his imagined superior being the "Übermensch". This 'Over Man' may be contrasted to a weak-willed individual, one who is tired of life, takes no risks, seeks only comfort and security. Nietzsche calls this passive being the Last Man


'I call this last man the ...fat American...


Russ

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Last_Man

Monday, April 3, 2006 at 11:18:00 AM CDT
Anonymous said...

After World War I, a Congressional hearing was called to try to
understand
how the United States got involved in such a pointless and disastrous
conflict. Americans had no dog in that fight, but they went to war
anyway.
And inquiring minds wanted to know: why?

Because the republic had been subverted, came the answer. While the
United
States had nothing at stake in Europe's war, the big banks did. They
had
lent millions to England and France. From their point of view, it was
vital that the United States enter the war on the side of the English
and
French, which it did in 1917.

Now cometh another war and another question: Why would the United
States
want to get involved in a war against nobody, for no apparent reason?
Weapons of Mass Destruction! Democracy! Terrorism! But, the slippery
explanations dried up just after daylight for those looking for more
practical explanations: Oil!

But - in the Middle East, at least - it is cheaper to buy oil than it
is
to steal it. Cheaper, that is, for the American consumers, which have
to
bear the costs. Whereupon, a Harvard professor, Stephen Walt, traipses
in
with another: Israel's powerful Washington lobby redirected American
foreign policy for its own interests.

The Mogambo Takes On Alex Trebek

The Daily Reckoning

London, England

Monday, April 03, 2006




Just more proof.

Russ

Tuesday, April 4, 2006 at 7:51:00 AM CDT
Anonymous said...

http://us.geocities.com/nasa_moons_usa/

I was looking for Nazis train sets and came upon this site. What an omen!

Only a madman would believe any of this...


Russ

Tuesday, April 4, 2006 at 9:48:00 AM CDT
Anonymous said...

Cynthia McKinney is one step above a crack whore. She is exactly how white libs see black women. She is held up while the clearly respectable Condelezza Rice is not.

Oh, right. Conservatives are the racists. Yeah, and there is no lib media. In fact, Al Gore is president.

Russ, have you any comment about the fact that the star of david is on the marine saber?

Miguel en Cuidad de Mexico con Baboso Foxx

Wednesday, April 5, 2006 at 5:41:00 PM CDT
Anonymous said...

Farrakhan and the Farrakhanvicts revealing themselves. I hate democrats.

http://www.finalcall.com/media/cuba/

Miguel en Havana

Wednesday, April 5, 2006 at 8:40:00 PM CDT
Anonymous said...

Miguel, the more I look the more I find that Jews run the US and England, Germany, etc. The funny part is that they have brought the West to her knees. I guess they figure that the Chinese will save them.

Russ

Thursday, April 6, 2006 at 8:12:00 AM CDT
Anonymous said...

Spreading the love:

http://www.finalcall.com/artman/publish/article_2512.shtml

lands taken from your hands by vampires with no remorse. They took the gold, the wisdom and all the storytellers. They took the Black women, with the Black man weak. Made to watch as they changed the paradigm of our village... White nationalism is what put you in bondage: pirates and vampires like Columbus, Morgan and Darwin drank the blood of the sheep, trampled all over them with steel, tricks and deceit...”


If black people feel so oppressed here in the states why dont they go to the Middle East.I don't get it. The only explanination is that black people are a bunch of hypocrites.


If black people feel so oppressed here in the states why don’t they go to the Middle East? I don't get it. The only explanation is that black people are a bunch of hypocrites. If this so called child prodigy knew anything she would know that Arab slave traders were in Africa long before ‘White Devils’ showed up. Lastly if it hadn't been for the 'White Devils' she never would have been born and I wouldn't have wasted my time responding to this hater.


Russ

PS God, I wish that I was a vampire.

Thursday, April 6, 2006 at 8:24:00 AM CDT
Anonymous said...

I have to add something: this so called genius obviously knows nothing about Darwin. He never supported slavery.



Russ

Thursday, April 6, 2006 at 8:27:00 AM CDT
Anonymous said...

http://ksgnotes1.harvard.edu/Research/wpaper.nsf


The nail in the coffin. Case closed.

Russ

Thursday, April 6, 2006 at 10:18:00 AM CDT
Anonymous said...

Russ, here you go.

http://www.worldtribune.com/
worldtribune/06/front2453832.
0965277776.html

Mike in Beijing via Tel Aviv

Thursday, April 6, 2006 at 6:41:00 PM CDT
Anonymous said...

Harvard no longer has any credibility, Russ, let alone the Ted Kennedy School of Government,

Mike

Thursday, April 6, 2006 at 6:44:00 PM CDT
Anonymous said...

Hey Mike, thanks for the link. Check this out:

"If you're a supporter of Israel, I would strongly urge you to help other countries become democracies," President Bush was quoted as saying in the Forward on December 16, 2005. "Israel's long-term survival depends upon the spread of democracy in the Middle East."

http://www.counterpunch.org/frank01202006.html

Russ

PS The war was never about the damn oil!!!!!!

Friday, April 7, 2006 at 12:07:00 PM CDT
Anonymous said...

At the centre of the crisis is Washington's fear that an Iranian nuclear weapon could be used against Israel or US forces in the region, such as the American air base at Incirlik in Turkey.

"If Iran makes another strategic mistake, such as ignoring demands by the UN or future resolutions, then the thinking among the chiefs is that military action could be taken to bring an end to the crisis. The belief in some areas of Whitehall is that an attack is now all but inevitable

http://www.worldtribune.com/worldtribune/nl83.html


Russ

Friday, April 7, 2006 at 12:16:00 PM CDT
Anonymous said...

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/12225188/

White House reportedly mulling military options for forcing regime change


The report also says the U.S. military is seriously considering the use of a tactical nuclear weapon against Iran to ensure the destruction of Iran’s main centrifuge plant at Natanz. The Pentagon advisor is quoted as saying some senior officers and officials were considering quitting over the issue.

I think that Bush was waiting for instructions from Sharon but since he seems to be offline maybe that will slow Bush down for the moment.

Russ

Saturday, April 8, 2006 at 8:19:00 PM CDT

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)