Wednesday, March 11, 2009

                             U.S. Army Puts Soldiers on the Street in Alabama in Response to Shootings                        

23 comments:

Anonymous said...

MTJ no show = gay

M

Marcus said...

Your gaydar has been going crazy lately, Mike. Might wanna take it in to the shop.

Anonymous said...

lol.

Did you see all that partying on St. Patrick's Day at the half-White House? Jeez! I wonder if AIG even had a St. Patrick's Day celebration. Impeach Obama.

Mike

Anonymous said...

"I hate retards."

Barack Obama

Anonymous said...

Man Mike what's happened lately?! Mike this isn't a slam on your but to make sure people keep up on the latest big info I'm going to post another website's address here ok?

www.lynnsamuels.com/

Lynn reminds me of you Mike. She's critical of Obama too and is calling out all the crap that's been happening lately.
That site has a LOT of good and informative news on it. Sadly it didn't have the Israeli troops treatment of Palestinians yet which I think is huge.
Drew

Illuminaughty said...

Well, at least that great speaker Obama didn't bash special needs kids this time.

Illuminaughty said...

Death to Tim "Global Currency" Geithner who, by the way, is a lib. Oh, I know...he's an independent. Cuckoo!

A story you won't hear on The Justice Files because it is racism only directed at white people: Brazilian president blames white people with blue eyes for current economic crisis.

Also, I wonder if this is the week that MTJ will stick up to Patrick the jew hater when he blames jews for whatever it is this week. I'll be holding my breath.

Marcus said...

Drew, I forgot to mention on the show (4/5), if you think atheism is a religion then you must agree that NOT builing model cars is a hobby and that bald is a hair color. The only reason a person would think atheism is a religion is because they don't understand what it is to be atheist. It is nothing more than the lack of belief in a god.

Illuminaughty said...

lol. Poor Marcus. He still doesn't get it.

Illuminaughty said...

I BELIEVE there is no god. That's a believe. It also violates the law of noncontradiction which is to affirm a negative. Logic and mathematics...enemies of Marcus.

Illuminaughty said...

oops...didn't proofread..."That's a belief."*

Illuminaughty said...

I hope I can get others to second the following:

I am speaking to MTJ now. At the end of The Justice Files Show today/yesterday, you mentioned that there will be something on about you during the day on KKFI Wednesday. Like the majority of your audience, I am interested in hearing it; however, like the majority of your audience, I will most likely not be able to hear it. Please make this available to us via your blog. If MTJ can't do it, perhaps one of those who comment on your blog (Jerry, Marcus, Drew, Miles, etc.) could record it and offer it up another way.

Thank you and I'm sorry for your loss with respect to the North Korean launch failing. ;)

Marcus said...

The law of non contradiction doesn't have to do with affirming a negative....
Do you believe there are unicorns?
Do you believe there are no unicorns?
There is no contradiction. What are you talking about? An actual contradiction is how your god is supposed to "be" love and charity, and yet it reportedly kills indiscriminately women, infants, elderly- and worse. Or maybe a contradiction like how your god is supposed to be omniscient, yet the bible describes an angry god that thinks making people was a mistake so kills almost all life on the planet. Is that the act of an omniscient? There are others, but I doubt you've read THIS far, so I'll just tell anyone that HAS made it this far to Ask Questions, Learn Answers.

Illuminaughty said...

When one affirms a negative, an assumption must be made: that person is omniscient with respect to the claim. There is a person who is omniscient with respect to the god question. There is no person who is omniscient with respect to the god question. Therefore, one violates the law of non-contradiction when affirming a negative with respect to the god question: "there is no god."

And the winner is...Uhhhhhhh-bama!!!

Marcus said...

You would have a point if I said "there is no god" but, what I say is "I don't believe in god". Your confusion may be when I specifically say "there is no yahweh" which is the christian god. I have shown how Yahweh breaks the logical law of contradiction which should cause you to cease belief in it, you don't, your belief in Yahweh is not based on logic... or math... it is faith, which is based on NOTHING. Faith is NOT a virtue.

Illuminaughty said...

The seven virtues are prudence, justice, restraint, courage, faith, hope, and love. Don't you have your catechism with you? Happy Easter.

Illuminaughty said...

The evolution in teaching math since the 1950s:

1. Teaching Math In 1950s

A logger sells a truckload of lumber for $100. His cost of
production is 4/5 of the price. What is his profit?

2. Teaching Math In 1960s

A logger sells a truckload of lumber for $100. His cost of
production is 4/5 of the price, or $80. What is his profit?

3. Teaching Math In 1970s
A logger sells a truckload of lumber for $100. His cost of
production is $80. Did he make a profit?

4. Teaching Math In 1980s

A logger sells a truckload of lumber for $100. His cost of
production is $80 and his profit is $20. Your assignment: Underline the number 20.

5. Teaching Math In 1990s

A logger cuts down a beautiful forest because he is selfish and inconsiderate and cares nothing for the habitat of animals or the preservation of our woodlands. He does this so he can make a profit of $20. What do you think of this way of making a living? Topic for class participation after answering the question: How did the birds and squirrels feel as the logger cut down their homes? (There are no
wrong answers, and if you feel like crying, it's ok).

6. Teaching Math In 2009

Un hachero vende u na carretada de maderapara $100. El costo de la producciones es $80. Cuanto dinero ha hecho?

Illuminaughty said...

"We surrender." - Obama to Somalia pirates

Illuminaughty said...

Put the conspiracy pipe down.

Illuminaughty said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
shawn said...

Michael,

I’m assuming at this point you have taken the time to kind of read over Michelle Obama’s thesis. If not, here are just some pieces to look over.

Earlier in my college career, there was no doubt in my mind that as a member of the Black community I was somehow obligated to this community and would utilize all of my present and future resources to benefit this community first and foremost. My experiences at Princeton have made me far more aware of my "Blackness" than ever before.

These experiences have made it apparent to me that the path I have chosen to follow by attending Princeton will likely lead to my further integration and/or assimilation in a white cultural and social structure that will only allow me to remain on the periphery of society

She spends most of her time making claims with no citations. So my perception of her thesis is that she felt that she was being forced to assimilate and integrate with white folks and that this clearly caused her problems. So much that she based her entire thesis on the subject. Maybe she was playing a more intelligent game of chess, who knows. The point is she played the race card and she did it in a very distasteful manner. If a white person had written this then attempted to run for any political office within the land, they would be labeled a racist or that they harbored some animosity towards black America. It is quite clear Michelle Obama did in fact harbor issues with her white professors and peers. I realize in your eyes that if Ms. Obama showed some gratitude as well as some class that would be considered another form of submission by “Black America” as you clearly stated with the “Yesssum massa, thank ya thank ya”. My question is, why didn’t she just attend a predominantly black college if she wanted to avoid integrating with “white” America? If I wanted to attend an all black college, wouldn’t I have to integrate with the social structure of that school if it was predominantly black? Wouldn’t it be some what hypocritical of me if I complained about it? I do know that I would be viewed as an arrogant snob and obviously a racist if I ever did attend a black college and shared her same view points. I highly doubt that I would be able to play the race card in those conditions but maybe I’m wrong. Maybe my black professors would feel sympathy for me once they read my thesis and they would pass me.

Now, for Sunday morning. I appreciate you taking the time to break down the differences between those who came in to the country and those who were forced and those who were all around treated poorly. How the Irish at least had a chance to make their way through the hard times and were able to integrate with the rest of “white” America. I understood your point and again I appreciated you taking the time to lay it out in such a format. However, the end of that discussion was again how blacks have had it harder.

The whole reason we had that discussion was because two of your callers were referring to myself as being a “sleazy car salesman” and a “slave owner”. Once I rebutted, I was stifled by “calm down, what’s wrong with you, why are you so angry”. Again, liberals playing the victim in order to get their point across. Which I still do not see. Michelle Obama was in fact and may very well still be harboring a lot of animosity towards white people. Which in my eyes is racist. You may or may not agree but that is exactly how it looks and to be cut down by some assholes who clearly did not even look at her thesis, well it is disappointing.

We didn’t even touch on her militant “fight the white power structure” church which her and her husband attended for nearly twenty years. We become products of our environment do we not? Yes, she just overlooked everything her preacher was rattling on about and her husband, when he quotes the Reverend Wright within his books, someone else just put that there. It was evil whitey.

You see, this is where Eric Holder appears to be a moron. These are the reasons that discussions of race can not carry on. They are always one sided and they are fueled primarily by ignorance or white guilt. When actual facts are discussed, they are dismissed and the person who brings them to the table are referred to as being racist or in this case “slave owner”. I personally believe Michael, while you have great intentions, you too harbor some animosity towards white people. Lastly, I want to say thank you for letting me come down to the show. Obviously I offended you and some how, your callers. Either way I apologize for that and I hope things turn around down there. Good luck.

Thanks,
Shawn

Anonymous said...

Just finished reading Michelle Obama thesis on racial divide found it to be a confusing jumble of thoughts. She should never have been passed but neither should the plagiarist King. She makes claims with not citations to back them up and then she repeats herself on and on and on and on and on.

http://dyn.politico.com/printstory.cfm?uuid=42FC5818-3048-5C12-005E33B3C0F4E64B

Anonymous said...

Just wanted to add after reading through Michelle Obama's thesis my IQ fell by 15 points.

No wonder the media tried to keep it out of the news.